Right-Click Select This is a read-only archive
← All ideas
  • Published 15 Jul 2026

Move Transparent Setting from Render | Film to Output section

Currently it is not very clear and somewhat hidden to new users, it would benefit all users to have it where the RGBA is set in my opinion. With the amount of times I've had to explain how to turn on transparency to render out with an alpha channel to new users has prompted me to finally ask: Is it possible to please move the Transparent option from Render | Film section to the Output section? It'll change lives!😊 MoveT2O.png

100%

Development Status: Open

Upvote 8 Downvote 0
Quadmyke
15 Jul 2026

4 Comments

Lauloque

I wonder if it still makes sense today to have to toggle an option to have transparency in the first place?

When you already have:

  • A file output that supports transparency;
  • Any form of transparency in the world shader (textures with alpha, or simply the Background node's color )

Then I find it weird that

  • You do not get transparency;
  • You have to toggle another option in another place to get transparency;
  • It sets the whole world transparent, thus discarding your world shader.

I think it would make much more sense, and even bring more flexibility than the current scenario, to let the transparency be driven entirely by the world shader.

Also perhaps in addition, bring to the world shader nodes the Transparent BSDF shader node, so that if someone wants a fully transparent world, it can be as simple as using that node instead of the current Background node. Though setting the background node's color to zero alpha would produce the same outcome.

benjaminround

To me a toggle for the world to become transparent does make sense. As its often used in compositing, when separating your world from everything else. I know you have the environment pass but that cuts out the combined pass from the env pass. My workflow is usually exporting the world from a duplicate scene with transparent set to off. With the main scene with transparent on.

That being said having the option to also have transparency in the world shader could be nice. But I don't think it replaces the transparent toggle, simply because most people want their environment lighting their scene and also want to render it transparent. Of course, you could then do an if camera ray make transparent in the world shader, but this is impractical, and slows the process for most people.

Lauloque

If I understand, then the issue with that workflow isn't the feature (since it can be done with the checkbox or nodes), but the checkbox being easier than setting up nodes.

Then, perhaps a way to refine what I propose would be to move that option to the Background node?

demo

Or better, mimic the behavior of objects' ray visibility options:

demo

This way:

  • If you want transparency based on color data fed into the background color node, it works out of the box without requiring extra clicks anywhere and with full flexibility.
  • If you want your world shader to be invisible to the camera, it's still only one click, but in the world settings.
Quadmyke Author

I understand what you are all saying, but I think you are missing the point. The purpose for making the background transparent is only for the output, there is no other reason I can think of to have the BG transparent in Blender. Moving it to the World settings or anywhere else is just changing it's hiding spot, therefore it should go somewhere in the output settings. It's standard to have a transparency setting when exporting an image format that supports it. Hope I'm making sense here.