← All ideas22 Jun 2020arkoprobhogupta23OpenGeneralarkoprobhogupta23EzyPolyGhisdalekzejuliotuxluisseyfer1n3odexpeter.boosramsn.anwiars2128sebbosebbo267tonypezzzero.osellame
NURBS workflow is not great in blender ,......it can be strengthened JUST LIKE CATIA.
100%
Development Status:
Open
Upvote13Downvote0
a
arkoprobhogupta23
22 Jun 2020
9 Comments
z
zero.osellame
Yes, 100%. I would even be ok with a .wire or .step importer that converted instantly to poly's.
4
l
luisseyfer1
Blender doesn`t need to replace NURBS modellers. Nevertheless it would be a great help, if we could import export such Data in general. I get all my input in NURBS. To build on top, I have to tessalate all this stuff, which is a nightmare and I cannot even do this inside Blender!
*
@isochrom1
* Nurbs would allow so much more in cad cam
1
O
OscarNebeAbad
Good Luck bro, Im still waiting for the Create Pixar Movie button...
a
arkoprobhogupta23Author
*
@Oscar 'Nebe' Abad
* That's y blender is not industry standard and CATIA AND RHINO are industry standard....Plus if they add better nurbs tools it will be easier to create smoother surfaces which can later be converted to mesh for other workflows
O
OscarNebeAbad
*
@arkoprobhogupta23
* are different tools, CATIA, Rhino, Revit, Solidworks and so, are parametric tools, made for industrial design based on NURBS, not polygons, and other DCCs like Maya, Max, Cinema, Blender... are made for other task. Im agree with that, if Blender works better with NURBS could be a punch to use together, in industrial product presentation pipeline for that parametric tools.
i
isochrom1
*
@Oscar 'Nebe' Abad
* - there are always pros and cons for different tools, we use subdivs enigneers/ind designers use nurbs. two completely different workflows.
9 Comments
Yes, 100%. I would even be ok with a .wire or .step importer that converted instantly to poly's.
Blender doesn`t need to replace NURBS modellers. Nevertheless it would be a great help, if we could import export such Data in general. I get all my input in NURBS. To build on top, I have to tessalate all this stuff, which is a nightmare and I cannot even do this inside Blender!
Hi! Please upvote, because it's like smaller one but more clear step in same direction: blender.community/c/rightclickselect/z6Q7 Maybe in this way it will goes faster
Forget NURBS use SUBDIVS
* @isochrom1 * Nurbs would allow so much more in cad cam
Good Luck bro, Im still waiting for the Create Pixar Movie button...
* @Oscar 'Nebe' Abad * That's y blender is not industry standard and CATIA AND RHINO are industry standard....Plus if they add better nurbs tools it will be easier to create smoother surfaces which can later be converted to mesh for other workflows
* @arkoprobhogupta23 * are different tools, CATIA, Rhino, Revit, Solidworks and so, are parametric tools, made for industrial design based on NURBS, not polygons, and other DCCs like Maya, Max, Cinema, Blender... are made for other task. Im agree with that, if Blender works better with NURBS could be a punch to use together, in industrial product presentation pipeline for that parametric tools.
* @Oscar 'Nebe' Abad * - there are always pros and cons for different tools, we use subdivs enigneers/ind designers use nurbs. two completely different workflows.