“rename” Blender 2.8 to 3.0
not a bug - but, it would be nice to have 2.8 renamed to 3.0 - it is a major rewrite that would provide a departure from the 2.X series nomenclature. Really liking 2.8! Thanks!
not a bug - but, it would be nice to have 2.8 renamed to 3.0 - it is a major rewrite that would provide a departure from the 2.X series nomenclature. Really liking 2.8! Thanks!
3 Comments
Just like Pablo said in the video linked in the comments : Blender 2.80 is great but still lacking of work on for a lot of features (and some of them are major ones). Blender 3.0 should have all the major features complete and fully usable for production works and even more, like Everything nodes, asset manager, sculpt mode reworked, particules system reworked, tool system reworked and so.
It is so minor, I wonder why this even have to be debated.
I recommend watching this video from Pablo on the blender.today youtube channel.
"Should Blender 2.8 be Blender 3?" youtu.be/iJE7vMmOYZ4